Monday, March 1, 2010

KALPITIYA

Saturday morning we left for Kalpitiya. From Negombo it is about 100 km to the north, so we were planning on taking a two-hour relaxed drive. The last part of the road was pretty bad, probably twenty or more kilometers, so the miscalculation plus our lousy ‘leaving on schedule’ got us there after 1 pm.



Kalpitiya has become quite fashionable in the last five years with lots of people trying to invest on beachfront properties, mostly owned by fisherfolk and the government. Big plans for big hotels are everywhere, but so far only the ‘eco-friendly’ wobbly cabins have emerged. The place is supposed to be ideal for dolphin watching and early every morning boats go out to chase dolphins that chase fish. I, alas, missed it all because this only happens at 7 in the morning. I tried to find out what is it that dolphins actually do the rest of the day other than chasing fish, but nobody was able to answer.



When you look Kalpitiya up in a map it appears as this thin peninsula that branches out into the ocean near Puttalam and encloses a huge lagoon almost 65 km. long as its far end approaches the island again. This rather simple idea is quite deceiving, when you’re there, you realize that this long peninsula that stretches up north develops into several other smaller forelands, islands and sand banks where the border between sea and lagoon is blurred with water and land and beaches and coconut trees everywhere you look at. Absolutely stunning.





As tourism grows and some fisherfolk start to shift their gruff ways to the more polite and profitable (and relaxed) business of learning some English and boating the Colombo-ites around to the beach and to watch the dolphins, a huge coal power plant also looms in the horizon. When in Kalpitiya you’re pretty much oblivious to this since you cannot actually see it, but in the twenty or so kilometers that go from the A3 road and into Kalpitiya, not only the plant is visible but also the flourishing of new white buildings that house its employees, most of them Chinese.






The country’s virtually official policy of rejecting western-led development projects with their self-righteous conditionings, has increasingly benefited the questionable improvement of receiving billions of dollars in Chinese-led development, which of course comes free of human rights accountability demands, but it is still to be seen what will be the share Sri Lanka will have to carry. While western paternalism is hard to swallow anymore, in Sri Lanka or anywhere it insists on correcting others, its terms seem vaguely more reliable and stable than becoming involved with the other guys, but Sri Lanka is happy to take the risk. In this sense, Kalpitiya is the perfect metaphorical example of the country’s current dilemma: develop high-end beach resorts with the implications that western demands brings along, or develop Chinese and Russian style, accepting the mob-like wink that gives the chills to many.





Our friend’s lodge is placed in an idyllic location, what seems to be one of the last tips of land in the north end of Kalpitiya. While it is technically on the ocean proper, there is a sand bank maybe half a mile away that connects two islands, so for all practical purposes, what you see from the lodge is a lagoon and a sandy beach that appears and disappears with the seasons in the horizon. We made use of two of the boats to get across this virtual lake to the sandbank where we could bathe in the ocean or on the quiet lagoon side. Some people walked, like an hour to get around, while others drove since the sand connected the whole semi-circle. The two boats used were also an interesting example of how tourism is changing labor patterns in the area. While the first we used was a multi-purpose dinghy that was cleaned-up to carry a few people, the second was owned by a Muslim guy who had recently spent almost $4,000 in this new spotless white motorboat with cushioned seats and a Miami-esque feel to it. Gladly, the owner’s jumping on and off the boat in his Sarong with the water to his neck to push the boat in and out of the beach managed to kill that feeling.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Guardian

The Guardian published an article on Sri Lanka's post-election future that I find quite depressing. The article itself is not depressing, on the contrary, it suggests that Sri Lanka has a unique opportunity for peace and development and that it is time to give it some more carrot and some less stick. I do agree that there is an opportunity for peace and that these don't come around so often, however Sri Lanka is a country that has had its decent share of opportunities for peace and growth in the past and has systematically wasted them through a combination of unwise decisions and jinxed turns.

I also agree that the country needs 'more carrot', but this should be a lesson that the government should learn and not one that we should be expecting the EU and other countries to enact. There is a clear need for tolerance and open hands, but it is the country's leadership who should understand this and not the international community who should have gestures of approval towards the current administration. After all, the world silently approved of the slaughtering of the Tamil population in the last couple of years by turning its back to the country. Perhaps it wouldn't hurt to finally put some pressure on a government that wants to smilingly get away with it.  

The article is depressing after all, because it tones down the violence the country is facing from its own leaders and suggests that 'all they need is a little more support from the West.' Granted that some external help wouldn't hurt at all, it seems rather naive at best, cynical I'd choose, to think that a little money would quiet the demands for peace and democracy that are systematically let down. To think that this is a question of 'buying out' disenfranchised oppositions, is to repeat the same strategy and fall in the same mistakes the country has addictively incurred in since Independence.

Democracy can be tricky at times. Especially when it is confused with electoral politics. Whoever thinks that Sri Lanka is a democratic country because it has periodically sustained elections needs to review their definition of what democracy is. Even if the day on which people go to the polls is a 'celebration of civility' and fraud is ruled out as it has been in the last elections, democracy can hardly be considered a green light to whoever gets more votes until the next election year comes around. A democratically elected government is far from being a democratic government, especially when politics are not cut across ideologies and parties but across religious and ethnic lines.

Opportunities for development are necessary, this is evident everywhere in the world, but Sri Lanka needs more than economic progress to move ahead from the last three decades of violence and frustration. Now, it is not that Sri Lanka needs more because of its complexity, because its values are so unique and different from those of the west, it is simply that any country that undergoes the kind of violence that Sri Lanka suffers will not be fixed with money.